NAT-T Implementation
From: Crist J. Clark (cristjc_at_comcast.net)
Date: 02/02/05
- Previous message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: racoon behaviour when SA expires"
- Next in thread: Eric Masson: "Re: NAT-T Implementation"
- Reply: Eric Masson: "Re: NAT-T Implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:20:25 -0800 To: net@freebsd.org
Now that NAT-T has moved on from Internet Draft to RFC, does
anyone out there know if anyone is working on an implementation
for FAST_IPSEC or KAME? I believe the isakmpd(8) daemon in
ports supports it, but AFAIK, the kernel does not. Short of
some really ugly divert(4) or netgraph(4) kludges (that is
not a totally idle threat either), are we going to see in-kernel
support for that anytime soon? Or is this code out there and
I just haven't seen it?
-- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: racoon behaviour when SA expires"
- Next in thread: Eric Masson: "Re: NAT-T Implementation"
- Reply: Eric Masson: "Re: NAT-T Implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]