Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE

From: David G. Andersen (dga_at_lcs.mit.edu)
Date: 02/09/05

  • Next message: David G. Andersen: "Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE"
    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:58:28 -0500
    To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@networx.ch>
    
    

    On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann scribed:
    > >
    > > (Barring that, has anyone patched it in their own system, and if so,
    > > would you mind sending me the patch? I dislike running custom kernel
    > > code on these machines, but I'm happy to do so to get things working. :)
    >
    > Sorry, it'll be fixed in 5.4-RELEASE. I have made up my mind how to
    > fix it the most correct way.

    Should have CC:'d; sorry.

    Thanks much for the quick response, Andre. If there's a patch available,
    or any workaround you can think of, I'd love to know. Also, if you
    need a beta tester or a test machine, or if there's anything else I
    can do, please don't hesitate to ask. I'm happy to hack on it if
    needs be.

      -Dave

    -- 
    Dave Andersen                                 dga at cs dot cmu.edu
    Assistant Professor                           412.268.3064
    Carnegie Mellon University                    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: David G. Andersen: "Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: BUG in check_monotonic_clock()
      ... mind sending that patch to Andrew? ... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] PS/2 mouse rate setting
      ... Mind sending me that kind of patch? ... eventually come up with a simple and elegant theory. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Small cleanups
      ... Would you mind sending another patch which would fix the potential leak? ...
      (Linux-Kernel)