Re: altq for vlans?

From: Jeremie Le Hen (jeremie_at_le-hen.org)
Date: 02/14/05

  • Next message: FreeBSD bugmaster: "Current problem reports assigned to you" 
    Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:43:53 +0100
To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>

    > Anyways, the _real_ problem is that traditionally, I'd used firewall
    > rules for accounting as well as security. To that end, labels are
    > very cool. However, they have one rather large defect:
    >
    > If you're dealing with keep state rules, there seems to be no obvious
    > way to account for incoming vs. outgoing traffic. The label only
    > reports total traffic for the state matching the rule... which is both
    > in and out.

    This is a workaround, but I found that ipfw's count rules are pretty
    useful for this purpose. This would however add processing overhead
    for each packet especially using gigabit Ethernet.

    Regards, 

    -- 
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie at le-hen dot org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: FreeBSD bugmaster: "Current problem reports assigned to you"