Re: ABI suggestions?
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 02/21/05
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Reply: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:11:00 -0800 To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 07:40:35PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >I'm looking at implementing a kernel module that implelemnts an ABI that
> >allows a particular tcp session to be followed.
> >I'm not terribly intereted in the data sent/received bas in the actual
> >session
> >behaviour itself..
>
> >p.s. would this be generally useful (assuming it can be achieve without
> >any overhead when compiled out)?
>
> Yes, I think that'd be very useful; when a user has a repeatable network
> problem, we could have them turn this on and create a detailed log file
> for us. In cases of reset connections, etc, this would be quite useful.
Wouldn't it be best to use KTR for this on 5.x/6.x instead of
introducing another KTR-alike?
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Reply: Mike Silbersack: "Re: ABI suggestions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]