Re: mpd + high cpu usage

From: Iasen Kostov (tbyte_at_OTEL.net)
Date: 02/23/05

  • Next message: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE"
    Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:08:24 +0200
    To: Iasen Kostov <tbyte@OTEL.net>
    
    

    Iasen Kostov wrote:

    > Hi,
    > I'm running some pptp servers using poptop+ppp and now I'm trying
    > how the situation will look like with mpd. I'm comparing two pptp ACs
    > - one using poptop+ppp and one using mpd. Both have 250 connected
    > users who are generating about 1MByte/sec.
    >
    > poptop+ppp :
    >
    > CPU states: 13.6% user, 0.0% nice, 12.1% system, 20.6% interrupt,
    > 53.7% idle
    >
    > and many ppp + pptpctrl
    >
    > mpd:
    >
    > CPU states: 11.7% user, 0.0% nice, 33.1% system, 36.2% interrupt,
    > 19.1% idle
    >
    > 90677 root 111 0 11100K 10028K RUN 175:27 39.75% 39.75% mpd
    > or
    > 90677 root 111 0 11100K 10028K select 175:17 37.84% 37.84% mpd
    >
    > Interesting thing is that sometimes cpu usage of mpd falls to 3-4% and
    > the processor goes to 80% idle but only for a few seconds.
    >
    System is FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Sat Dec 11 02:13:32 EET 2004 on CPU:
    Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3006.83-MHz 686-class CPU) with 1G RAM

    #:> mpd -v
    Version 3.18 (root@LANGW5.otel.net 19:21 21-Feb-2005)

    Regards
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: Kern/73129 and 5.3-STABLE"

    Relevant Pages

    • mpd + high cpu usage
      ... I'm running some pptp servers using poptop+ppp and now I'm trying ... how the situation will look like with mpd. ... I'm comparing two pptp ACs - ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Problems with netgraph
      ... I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, ... Maybe it's a poor design in netgraph the way it handle its tables and it's is probably not designed to add so many interfaces. ... idle: cpu1 ... usable memory = 8580038656 ...
      (freebsd-net)