Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance
From: Mark Tinguely (tinguely_at_casselton.net)
Date: 03/08/05
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- In reply to: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Next in thread: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Noritoshi Demizu: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:11:00 -0600 (CST) To: daniel@benzedrine.cx, spork@fasttrackmonkey.com
Basing from what I see in Daniel Hartmeier analysis of tcpdump
(I honestly did not look at the original, when is has been summerized
so conveniently):
The server is not telling the client that a packet has been lost.
The first two ACKs are correct duplicate ACKs, but the remaining
ACKs coming from he server have window adjustments, so the
client does not treat them as duplicate ACKs coming from a packet
loss.
--Mark Tinguely
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- In reply to: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Next in thread: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Noritoshi Demizu: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|