RE: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance
From: Mark Tinguely (tinguely_at_casselton.net)
Date: 03/09/05
- Previous message: Theo Schlossnagle: "FreeBSD 5.3 if_re.c (re) altq compatibility patch"
- In reply to: Nickolay Kritsky: "RE: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Charles Sprickman: "RE: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:51:04 -0600 (CST) To: daniel@benzedrine.cx, spork@fasttrackmonkey.com
Thinking about the trace a little more, the Apple send buffer must be set
much lower (about 18-19KB ballpark) than the FreeBSD recieve buffer (56 KB).
If these settings were simular, the Apple machine should be providing
more data as the FreeBSD gives the window updates - this would give
the FreeBSD side more chances to give duplicate ACKs to recover quicker.
For related curiousities, would you tell me if the FreeBSD a Uniprocessor
or multiprocessor?
--Mark Tinguely.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Theo Schlossnagle: "FreeBSD 5.3 if_re.c (re) altq compatibility patch"
- In reply to: Nickolay Kritsky: "RE: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Reply: Charles Sprickman: "RE: FreeBSD 4.x and OS-X tcp performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|