Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned...
From: Sten Spans (sten_at_blinkenlights.nl)
Date: 03/19/05
- Previous message: Danny Braniss: "Re: iSCSI initiator driver beta version, testers wanted"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Reply: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:57:19 +0100 (CET) To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> Well, right now most (all?) drivers handle the alignment issue, so moving the
> alignment step into the ethernet code would centralize it in one place, and
> would not break anything. Removing the alignment requirement without
> actually having tested all the protocols is going to break something. Having
> the protocols handle alignment themselves is a good goal, but that's a second
> step you can take later.
em with jumboframes is borken atm.
It seems some drivers don't handle the jumboframes -
chained mbufs case quite correctly.
-- Sten Spans "There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in." Leonard Cohen - Anthem _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Danny Braniss: "Re: iSCSI initiator driver beta version, testers wanted"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Reply: Mike Silbersack: "Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|