Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets
From: Peter Sewell (Peter.Sewell_at_cl.cam.ac.uk)
Date: 03/29/05
- Previous message: Paul Willmann: "Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver"
- In reply to: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: gnn@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:26:13 +0100
>Hi Peter,
>
>Interesting paper and work.
Many thanks.
>Are you plannning to share the tools as
>well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the
>ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests.
It's unclear at the moment - we'd certainly like to make that
regression testing more routine, but the current tools are non-trivial
to drive. We'll be looking to see how much interest there is, and
also how accessible the spec is, before going further.
What kind of regression testing is in use now?
best wishes,
Peter
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Paul Willmann: "Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver"
- In reply to: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|