Re: em(4) + bridging
From: Ruslan Ermilov (ru_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 03/30/05
- Previous message: Philip Olsson: "Re: em(4) + bridging"
- In reply to: Philip Olsson: "Re: em(4) + bridging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:23 +0300 To: Philip Olsson <olsson@puffy.nu>
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:27:14PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Iam woundering if there exists any patchset that will fix the broken
> >>em-driver or if anyone can bring my up to date with the development of
> >>the driver.
> >
> 5-stable
>
> >>Right now I want to do dummynet on em with dot1q, works fine with other
> >>nics but I want to do it with a em(4) card.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >You decide, do you need bridge(4) or dummynet(4) (subject and body
> >disagree)? I fixed a broken "bridging on VLANs whose parent
> >interfaces support h/w VLAN tag encapsulation" in HEAD a while ago,
> >on February 18, in this commit:
> >
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/040840.html
> >
> >
> >
> I need both briding and dummynet, right now briding does not work.
> Your change is only in -current, i run stable.
> I will try to try them later tonight.
>
As a work-around, em(4) driver supports turning off VLAN tagging
in hardware, so you can switch it off without code modifications
and expect with a reasonable chance of success it will now work.
For example,
ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag
Then try bridging on VLAN interfaces again. If it works now,
then merging my patch to RELENG_5 will definitely help you.
Unfortunately, I'm not in a mood (nor I think re@ would) to
merge (commit) this change now, so close to a release.
Cheers,
-- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Philip Olsson: "Re: em(4) + bridging"
- In reply to: Philip Olsson: "Re: em(4) + bridging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]