Re: ipv6 host part
From: Dean Strik (dean_at_stack.nl)
Date: 04/29/05
- Previous message: Sten Spans: "Re: if_tap unaligned access problem"
- In reply to: Neo-Vortex: "Re: ipv6 host part"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:49:02 +0200 To: Neo-Vortex <root@Neo-Vortex.net>
Neo-Vortex wrote:
> alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This
> is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wishes
> to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the address
> is on the same subnet as the first network address for this
> interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually
> 0xffffffff is most appropriate.
>
> That is for IPv4 taken from ifconfig(8), one would assume for IPv6 it is
> the same and i use it like that without issues (although i have not tried
> it the other way)
Your assumption is wrong.
-- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Sten Spans: "Re: if_tap unaligned access problem"
- In reply to: Neo-Vortex: "Re: ipv6 host part"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
