Re: transparent Squid 2.5Stable10 + FreeBSD 5.3
From: fooler (fooler_at_skyinet.net)
Date: 06/21/05
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- In reply to: Ryan Rathje : "transparent Squid 2.5Stable10 + FreeBSD 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Ryan Rathje " <mrsharky@iastate.edu> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:32:17 +0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Rathje " <mrsharky@iastate.edu>
To: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: transparent Squid 2.5Stable10 + FreeBSD 5.3
> ipfw add allow all from any to 192.168.1.2 80
> ipfw add fwd 192.168.1.2 tcp from any to 192.168.1.2 3128
> ipfw add fwd 192.168.1.2,3128 tcp from any to any 80,82,3128 out recv
> 192.168.1.2 xmit 129.186.215.57
>
> My gut feeling is it has something to do with my ipfw rules, any and ALL
help
> would get GREATLY appreciated. thanks
yup your gut feeling is correct :->
you dont need to enable IPFILTER if you use IPFW...
your simple ipfw rule for transparent proxy looks like this:
ipfw add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in via <nic2 interface
name>
fooler.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- In reply to: Ryan Rathje : "transparent Squid 2.5Stable10 + FreeBSD 5.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
