Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)
From: Ari Suutari (ari_at_suutari.iki.fi)
Date: 06/23/05
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- In reply to: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Next in thread: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:46:31 +0300 To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Ari Suutari wrote:
>
> ipfw setnexthop g2.g2.g2.g2 tcp from any to any defaultroute
Looking at code, maybe "defaultroute" option should be named
verdstreach ?
Ari S.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- In reply to: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Next in thread: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]