IPv6 Extension Headers
From: Srinivas Goud (cnugoud_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/29/05
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: IPv6 Extension Headers"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: IPv6 Extension Headers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:10:50 +0530 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Hello All,
I am new bee to this group.
I am working on IPv6 Extension headers. I am confused with freeBSD
implementation and RFC2460 specification for Destination options.
My interpretation from RFC2460 is that, If a packet consists of
hop-by-hop and destination extension headers, destination header
should be inserted inside AH.
i.e., hop + AH + dst.
But freeBSD implementation is the other way,
i.e., hop + dst + AH.
which is the correct way of implementation according to RFC2460? Please
let me know, if my interpretation is wrong.
Also, let me know AH insertion place in the following cases.
1. hop + dst
2. hop + dst + route
3. hop + dst + route + dst
4. hop + dst + dst
5. hop + dst + dst + route + route
6. hop + dst + dst + route + route + dst + dst
7. hop + dst + dst + route + dst + route + dst + dst
Any help/suggestion is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Srinivas.
-- Srinivas Goud "Everything is Nicer when shared with a Friend" _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ari Suutari: "Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: IPv6 Extension Headers"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: IPv6 Extension Headers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|