Re: AltQ + ng_iface

From: Julian Elischer (julian_at_elischer.org)
Date: 07/29/05

  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: AltQ + ng_iface"
    Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:39:37 -0700
    To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
    
    

    Daniel O'Connor wrote:

    >Hi,
    >I am looking at using pf + AltQ + mpd instead of my original ipfw + dummynet +
    >ppp setup but it seems that ng_iface doesn't have any AltQ hooks :(
    >
    >I had a look at it to see if they could be retrofitted but alas it appears the
    >ng_iface driver is not very much like others (ie no queueing of packets?) so
    >it would need more work..
    >
    >I could use ppp(8) and do queueing on tun, but I would prefer to use mpd as
    >all of the packet movement is in the kernel which makes sense to me.
    >
    >Does anyone have any patches for this? Or is it just a dumb idea and I should
    >live with ppp(8)? :)
    >
    >

    is there altq for tun or gif?

    >Thanks.
    >
    >
    >
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: AltQ + ng_iface"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: AltQ + ng_iface
      ... >ng_iface driver is not very much like others (ie no queueing of packets?) so ... >all of the packet movement is in the kernel which makes sense to me. ... ipfw and dummynet work on ng_iface I believe. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • AltQ + ng_iface
      ... ppp setup but it seems that ng_iface doesn't have any AltQ hooks:( ... I could use pppand do queueing on tun, but I would prefer to use mpd as ... all of the packet movement is in the kernel which makes sense to me. ... for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au ...
      (freebsd-net)