polling in 4.11 vs 5.4

From: Mao Shou Yan (david.mao_at_thomson.net)
Date: 08/23/05

  • Next message: dima: "Re: polling in 4.11 vs 5.4" 
    Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:49:56 +0800
To: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>

    Hi, everybody,

     

             I hope this is the right place that I post to!

     

             When I enabled polling in 5.4 and 4.11, I found that CPU load
    in 5.4 is much higher than 4.11. For example, suppose HZ is 5000, in 5.4
    the idle CPU is about 87%, but in 4.11, the idle CPU is about 99.9%. Is
    this right? Or the statistic is wrong in 4.11?

             BTW, ACPI is disabled under 5.4.

    BTW, I found that context switch in 5.4 is much higher than 5.4 while
    enabling polling. (Using systat -vmstat 1)

             I'm looking forward your reply.

             Any response is welcome!

     

     

     

    David.Mao

     

     

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: dima: "Re: polling in 4.11 vs 5.4"

    Relevant Pages

    • polling in 4.11 vs 5.4
      ... the idle CPU is about 87%, but in 4.11, the idle CPU is about 99.9%. ... BTW, I found that context switch in 5.4 is much higher than 5.4 while ... (Using systat -vmstat 1) ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: supported hardware accelerated 3D card with OpenGL driver
      ... with great DVD playback with mostly idle CPU and minimal memory usage, ... with hardware mpeg decoding, blending deinterlace, on vlc. ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
      (Debian-User)