Re: Aggregate network interfaces

From: Dave+Seddon (dave-sender-1932b5_at_seddon.ca)
Date: 08/26/05

  • Next message: Evgueni V. Gavrilov: "Re: Aggregate network interfaces" 
    To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:49:16 +1000

    Greetings,

    Oh wow! That's cool. I missed that somehow. The 'man' page doesn't
    mention the hash functions options.

    On the Cat 6500s you can log into the Sup and change the hash function so
    it's not just IP, but rather IP+Port. I've previously used this to balance
    the load across multiple gig links with traffic going to a sinlge backup
    host, for example. (I you want to know how I'll have to look that up)

    Regards,
    Dave Seddon

     

    Evgueni V. Gavrilov writes:

    > In article <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca> you wrote:
    >
    >> IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but
    >> that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel.
    > you missed ng_fec(4) which runs fine for me with Catalyst 3750 stack (Cisco WS-C3750G-24TS) (gigabit ethernet)
    >
    > --
    > http://aquatique.rusunix.org
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
     

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Evgueni V. Gavrilov: "Re: Aggregate network interfaces"