Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux
From: Olivier Nicole (on_at_cs.ait.ac.th)
Date: 09/19/05
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Re: Efficient use of Dummynet pipes in IPFW"
- In reply to: Sam Leffler: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Peter van Dijk: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Reply: Peter van Dijk: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:06:19 +0700 (ICT) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> What Motonori Shindo described is actually the default behaviour for
> Linux kernels (at least my 2.6.8-kernel does it by default). It could be
> seen as a sort of proxy-arp, but only for the host itself, not other
> systems. Let me try to describe when it happens. Say you have
> 192.168.42.42 bound on eth0 and have eth1 connected to some ethernet
> LAN. When a host on that eth1-connected LAN sends an 'arp who-has
> 192.168.42.42', a Linux system will answer that arp-request with it's
> eth1 MAC-address, although the IP-address is bound on eth0 and the arp
> request comes in on eth0. FreeBSD obviously doesn't do this.
To me, it seems that FreeBSD does just that too once bridge is enabled.
Olivier
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Re: Efficient use of Dummynet pipes in IPFW"
- In reply to: Sam Leffler: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Peter van Dijk: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Reply: Peter van Dijk: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|