Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux
From: Peter van Dijk (peter_at_dataloss.nl)
Date: 09/19/05
- Previous message: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- In reply to: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Reply: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:33:22 +0200 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:06:19PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> To me, it seems that FreeBSD does just that too once bridge is enabled.
'Enabling' bridging is a no-op.. However, when you -configure- a
couple of interfaces together in a bridge, they share this behaviour;
but this is correct as bridging is supposed to effectively merge the
chosen interfaces into one. This does not affect any other interfaces,
which makes it substantially different from the Linux behaviour.
Cheers, Peter
-- peter@dataloss.nl | ~ tonight tonight, what is this potion http://blog.dataloss.nl/ | ~ that makes a fool of me UnderNet/#clue | Wayfinder, fr-025 soundtrack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- In reply to: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Reply: Olivier Nicole: "Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|