Re: Bug in routing tables ?

From: Ricardo A. Reis (ricardo_bsd_at_yahoo.com.br)
Date: 11/24/05

  • Next message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Bug in routing tables ?" 
    Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:22:00 -0200
To: Milan Obuch <milan@dino.sk>, net@freebsd.org

    Hi Milan,

              I use route with /netmask[bits] GW, this work fine for me for
    severals years, I erred in never read route(8) :-( but this
    "136.16&0xac160181" is very strange for me, and for you ?

    >On Thursday 24 November 2005 17:28, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Hi all,
    >>
    >> I insert this route in my workstation for network test,
    >>
    >>#route add -net 200.144.xx.xx 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >man route:
    >
    > route [-n] command [-net | -host] destination gateway [netmask]
    >
    >so no, this ain't network bug, just screwed usage.
    >Regards,
    >Milan
    >
    >
    >
    >>Routing tables
    >>
    >>Internet:
    >>Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
    >>default 200.144.xx.xxx UGS 1 13407 rl0
    >>127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 46 lo0
    >>136.16&0xac160181 255.255.254.0 UGS 0 34 rl0
    >>??????????????????????????
    >>
    >>
    >>The question is ........................ this is a network bug?
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>OBS: using /23 this work perfectly!!
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>Ricardo A. Reis
    >>UNIFESP
    >>Unix and Network Admin
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>_______________________________________________
    >>freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Bug in routing tables ?"