Re: Bug in routing tables ?
From: Brian Candler (B.Candler_at_pobox.com)
Date: 11/26/05
- Previous message: george+freebsd_at_m5p.com: "ACPI interaction with re(4) driver"
- In reply to: Ricardo A. Reis: "Re: Bug in routing tables ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:43:08 +0000 To: "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:20:01PM -0200, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
> But i use route add 200.144.xx.xx/[mask] 172.22.xx.xx for
> many year, and this work perfectly on freebsd and linux.
Yes it does (as of a couple of years ago, I think).
However if you want to specify the netmask explicitly instead of a prefix
length, as the O.P. did, then you have to include the '-netmask' keyword.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: george+freebsd_at_m5p.com: "ACPI interaction with re(4) driver"
- In reply to: Ricardo A. Reis: "Re: Bug in routing tables ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
