Question on IFF_PPROMISC (and IFF_PROMISC)
- From: Gregory Nou <gregorynou@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:16:58 +0100
Hi,
I found a (somewhat old) post from gnn@ on this topic there : http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2004-09/0289.html
I also think that it would be a good idea to do it (at least, it would be easier to understand, because IFF_PPROMISC is not that explicit). If nobody has already done it, I'll work on this.
There is another point on which I would appreciate to know your opinion:
referring to if.c[1269], I understand that if IFF_PPROMISC is set in ifp->if_flags, IFF_PROMISC should be set to (or we are in a transient
situation).
It appears that if_ethersubr.c[652] is working in this case. Isn't it a mistake ?
Thanks a lot ! -- Gregory
PS : Gleb, Jon, thanks for your answers on vlan. It helped a lot :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Prev by Date: Re: Failover and load balancing using advanced NAT daemon
- Next by Date: Re: Marvell/SysKonnect YukonII source code available
- Previous by thread: Failover and load balancing using advanced NAT daemon
- Next by thread: Named could not listen on UDP socket: permission denied
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|