Re: Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- From: Josef Karthauser <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:16 +0000
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:27:56PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 03:14:35PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote:
J> I'm guessing that this is a bug (or feature!).
This is not a bug, nor a feature. This is a feature, that hasn't
been implemented to the end.
Historically, the routes in kernel were static. And they are static
now. Historically, BSD won't permit you to install same IP addresses,
or even addresses in the same subnet, on different interfaces. Now,
FreeBSD permits addresses in the same subnet. But route entries are
still static, and aren't reconfigring when an interface changes its
flags.
I expected it was something like that, but I thought I'd still make a
little noise about it in case someone was right on the verge of having
it fixed :).
Joe
p.s. have you seen kern/93305? It looks like my em0 still has a few
problems. Would you mind taking a look?
--
Josef Karthauser (joe@xxxxxxxxxx) http://www.josef-k.net/
FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker) http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/
Physics Particle Theory (student) http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/
================ An eclectic mix of fact and theory. =================
Attachment:
pgp5zKsj4wHJG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- From: Josef Karthauser
- Re: Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- From: Gleb Smirnoff
- Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot unload if_ath kernel module / machine does not shut down
- Next by Date: NIS client in a Jail
- Previous by thread: Re: Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- Next by thread: Re: Default gateway - wrong interface. !
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
