Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing
- From: tpeixoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:55:41 -0300 (BRT)
Hello all!
We have a machine working as a router and bandwidth limiter for our
network. It routes the traffic through two 'bge' interfaces utilizing only
public IPs. No NAT is used. We only have IPFW rules for traffic shaping by
MAC addresses.
It works fine, but we have been experiencing high latency and packet loss.
There is no other major services in this machine, cpu utilization is low,
memory is fine, no disk activity, but load average is always around 1.5 or
2, even if I disable IPFW layer 2 filtering.
Network traffic is not greater than 12 Mbit/s.
The system is a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, running on a dual CPU: Intel(R)
Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3051.47-MHz 686-class CPU) compiled with SMP kernel:
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6
cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7
top output:
last pid: 14039; load averages: 1.61, 1.62, 1.56
37 processes: 1 running, 35 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 1.4% system, 30.8% interrupt, 67.8% idle
Mem: 16M Active, 421M Inact, 149M Wired, 688K Cache, 112M Buf, 1417M Free
Swap: 1024M Total, 1024M Free
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
6245 root 96 0 2672K 2236K select 2 3:48 0.00% 0.00% dhcpd
329 root 96 0 1328K 892K select 0 2:48 0.00% 0.00% syslogd
453 root 96 0 3384K 2508K select 2 0:33 0.00% 0.00% sshd
systat -iostat output:
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10
Load Average ||||||||||
/0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100
cpu user|
nice|
system|
interrupt|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
idle|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
/0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100
da0 MB/s
tps|X
pass0 MB/s
tps|
Can anyone give me some advice?
Thank you in advance!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing
- From: Lee Johnston
- Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing
- Prev by Date: VLAN interfaces and routing
- Next by Date: Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing
- Previous by thread: VLAN interfaces and routing
- Next by thread: Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: 2003 Server slowed to a crawl
... click Processes then CPU column to sort by ... Investigate a possible Network
problem (is there a broadcast storm ... >> method for telling the computer's processor
that it needs attention. ... >> which have signed drivers (such hardware is sold
with a Microsoft Windows ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.general) - Re: Game Company- Java Server Thread Priority
... > Program takes 0% of the CPU load, and when processing a turn goes up to ...
An example of network waits. ... expected it to go *up* (since the server box wasn't running
the client too). ... involved a network access which slowed it down massively. ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer) - Re: 2003 Server slowed to a crawl
... click Processes then CPU column to sort by processes ... > the network,
are backing up large amounts of user data during production ... > method for telling the computer's
processor that it needs attention. ... > which have signed drivers (such hardware is
sold with a Microsoft Windows ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.general) - Re: Got idle CPU cycles?
... >> freeze a network solid. ... Any host CPU will have its pipes
completely filled. ... Increment the radius, do it again. ... crystal structure
data that we are exploring. ... (comp.os.linux.misc) - Re: a proposed callout API
... of the network implementation in such different operating systems ... The basic
premise is that you can make better use of any available cpu ... the operating systems
are so different from each other I don't think ... (freebsd-arch)