Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Marko Lerota <marko.lerota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:09:33 +0200
Marko Lerota <marko.lerota@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
429 root 1 4 0 1204K 820K - 0 581:42 13.48% nfsd
430 root 1 4 0 1204K 820K - 0 10:37 0.00% nfsd
Here is the config
rc.conf
#######################
rpcbind_enable="YES"
portmap_enable="YES"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 4 -h 10.3.11.43"
mountd_flags="-r"
nfs_client_enable="YES"
#######################
My friend found the 'problem' but I'm not shure who's problem it is.
The clients or the nfs servers. In the handbook section about NFS there
is nothing about this.
These options are added in rc.conf and server now works correctly.
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
But later in the handbook section:
Figure 2-54. Network Configuration Lower-level
The rpcbind(8), rpc.statd(8), and rpc.lockd(8) utilities are all used for
Remote Procedure Calls (RPC). The rpcbind utility manages communication
between NFS servers and clients, and is *required* for NFS servers to operate
correctly.
So I think this should be in the NFS section. Anyone?
The clients are RedHatES4 and servers are FreeBSD 6.1
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
Tacunka Witco
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Marko Lerota
- nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Prev by Date: Re: nd6_lookup prints bogus messages with point to point devices
- Next by Date: Re: improving transport over lossy links ?
- Previous by thread: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Next by thread: Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
