Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:53:08 -0400
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote:
Nash Nipples <trashy_bumper@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi Marko,
Actually i dont find that load critical. I think those lines well tell that actually the process is running 581m42s and now it utilizes 13.48%
Sometimes it was 80%
which sounds like a "kernel tuning issue" if you have excluded nfsserver out of your kernel config last time u were compiling it. if you didnt just skip this part at this time.
please make sure that the following lines do exist
options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT
No
These options are added in rc.conf and server now works correctly.
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
It didn't help.
See discussion on stable@ for what is believed to be the problem.
Backing out the changes to vfs_lookup.c would work around the problem
for now (although it reintroduces other bugs).
Now cpu is like it should be, but BSD crashes twice a day
with nothing in logs that I can find.
What do you mean "crashes" then? Do you need to configure crashdumps
as described in the handbook and developers' handbook?
Kris
Attachment:
pgph63tK2a6TJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Heinrich Rebehn
- Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- References:
- Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Nash Nipples
- Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- From: Marko Lerota
- Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 raw socket to send original udp
- Next by Date: interface notifications
- Previous by thread: Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Next by thread: Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem
- Index(es):