Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:49:52 -0700
On 7/21/06, Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
> We, myself and Prafulla Deuskar at Intel LAD, have a driver and stack
> changes that support Intel's new I/OAT DMA hardware. This is a
> DMA engine in the chipset. There is potential to use the hardware
>
> We are hoping to get this code into CURRENT soon if there
> is interest.
Sure there is an interest, spare CPU cycles are never superfluous
in production environment! What hardware (NICs/chipsets) supports this
I/OAT DMA engine?
Oh, and there is nothing changed in the NIC and its driver, this is just
stack changes together with the chipset dma driver I wrote, so any
NIC on a system will benefit.
Jack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- References:
- complement to sendfile()?
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: David G. Lawrence
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: Jack Vogel
- Re: complement to sendfile()?
- From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov
- complement to sendfile()?
- Prev by Date: Re: complement to sendfile()?
- Next by Date: Re: Packet Construction and Protocol Testing...
- Previous by thread: Re: complement to sendfile()?
- Next by thread: Re: complement to sendfile()?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|