Re: [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- From: Max Laier <max@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:46:04 +0200
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 20:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
This code is running on quite a few systems but in a very limited
environment that may not test all possibilities..
Does anyone have comments or suggestions as to changes that I might make
for checkin into generic FreeBSD? It was originally written for 4.x but
with 6.x in mind.
It is now running on 6.1 and seems to be ok so far.
Certainly I am interested in hearing from Robert and Luigi and I am
particularly interested in
what people think on how this will handle locking/SMP difficulies.
Instead of putting more special processing to every L2-entry point in the
system, I'd prefer if we could finally get round to L2 pfil hooks. That
would make it much easier to add such functionality in a common hook function
and use it everywhere.
--
/"\ Best regards, | mlaier@xxxxxxxxxxx
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
pgpXZfD5p1CfL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- From: Christian S.J. Peron
- Re: [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- References:
- [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- From: Julian Elischer
- [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- Prev by Date: Re: [FreeBSD-6.1Release]About the removal of route cache in PCB
- Next by Date: Re[2]: multiple DSL modems and pppoe sessions on the same ethernet ?
- Previous by thread: [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] RFC: allow divert from layer 2 ipfw (e.g. bridge)
- Index(es):