Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Brooks Davis <brooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:09 -0500
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:21:41PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
Queries to 254.169.in-addr.arpa MUST return NXDOMAIN (or RCODE 3,
to choose a non-BIND specific term).
We're talking about mDNS here, not DNS. I would argue that because
mDNS is link-local it makes perfect sense to be able to resolve
254.169.in-addr.arpa using mDNS.
True, agreed-- that's in part (b) of what I quoted. The specific
part is:
"Names that are resolvable only on the local link (such as through
use of
protocols such as Link Local Multicast Name Resolution [LLMNR]) MUST NOT
be used in off-link communication."
What this means is that the hostname-to-address mapping for
254.169.in-addr.arpa addresses must be unique per interface. If you
have two interfaces which are connected to different LLA subnets,
169.254.1.1 might map to hostnameA on one, and that same IP might be
hostnameB on the other.
Hmm, that seems to argue for some further namespace mangling so forward
lookups make sense. From that perspective the namespace really should
be xxx.<interface>.local internally and xxx.local on the wire. Actually
doing that would probably cause all sorts of problems though. :(
-- Brooks
Attachment:
pgpVqm0RVT6ln.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Pat Lashley
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Fredrik Lindberg
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Fredrik Lindberg
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- Prev by Date: Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- Next by Date: [Fwd: New Bonjour Internet Drafts posted]
- Previous by thread: Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- Next by thread: Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
- Index(es):