Re: Long keepidle time
- From: Mike Silbersack <silby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:07:40 -0500 (CDT)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Simon Walton wrote:
Thanks. I did not go with ipfw2 partly because of concerns about
whether it was stable enough (this is on 4.10) and also because
it requires rebuilding part of userland. Perhaps this would
be the way to go after all.
The only way you'll know is to try it. :)
Note that the probes are retransmitted a few times (I think eight times)
before the connection is considered dead, so it would take longer
than two minutes.
Simon Walton
True, I had forgotten about that fact.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Long keepidle time
- From: Simon Walton
- Re: Long keepidle time
- From: Mike Silbersack
- Re: Long keepidle time
- From: Simon Walton
- Long keepidle time
- Prev by Date: Re: Long keepidle time
- Next by Date: tcp/udp performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Long keepidle time
- Next by thread: Re: Long keepidle time
- Index(es):