Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:59:24 -0800
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
Is adding a hub or a bridge a topology change? I'd argue that it wasn't.
Um. Adding a normal client machine to an existing hub or switch does not constitute a topology change. Adding a new hub or bridge most certainly would constitute a topology change.
[ Add "IMHO" and salt if needed to season to taste. But if the result of a change can result in a loop-- ie, connecting two ports on the new hub to the rest of the network, or connecting two ports from a bridge to the same hub/switch-- or if the change might result in the network no longer being in compliance with the networking requirements (ie, you can only daisy-chain a limited number of hubs together before you break the timing tolerance)-- such changes do effect the topology... ]
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Benjamin Adams
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Josh Paetzel
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Josh Paetzel
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- From: Brett Glass
- Bandwidth Monitoring program
- Prev by Date: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- Next by Date: dummynet throughput problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- Next by thread: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|