Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:56:38 +0100
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:13:00AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
this way it's hard to distingvish in a packet filter(let's say pf),
among connections originating from within the jail itself or
from the host system to the jail.
I won't ask why you would want to do that if you control it
from the "host" system anyway...
Additionally, ipfw(8) has the "jail" keyword, though it is easier to
work with IP addresses since jail ids are bumped whenever you restart
a jail.
Regards,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- From: Gergely CZUCZY
- Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- References:
- jail addresses and default bindings
- From: Gergely CZUCZY
- Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
- jail addresses and default bindings
- Prev by Date: Re: Diagnose co-location networking problem
- Next by Date: Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- Next by thread: Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|