Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:10:50 -0800
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:11:15PM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote:
Hi all:
Here is iteration 2 of the mbuf patch with limits I
proposed.
Also note the changes for sysctl stuff that Lugi suggested.
Please let me know what you think :-)
...
+ newnmbjclusters = nmbjumbop;
+ error = sysctl_int_checked(oidp, &newnmbjclusters, nmbjumbop,
+ SYSCTL_NO_LIMIT, req);
A few things here:
- i don't see much of a point in defining SYSCTL_NO_LIMIT;
UINT32_MAX would do perfectly there, and i think it is easier
to understand than SYSCTL_NO_LIMIT (which looks like a flag).
- here and in other places you do not allow decresaing the value
(by putting min = nmbjumbop etc.), and i am not sure why.
I understand a reasonable lower bound, but i guess the worst
that can happen, when you reduce the limit to something above
the current allocation, is that nothing is allocated until
you go again below the limit, right ?
- given that you don't use the new value if error != 0, perhaps
you can save the assignment newnmbjclusters = nmbjumbop;
And below:
+/*
+ * Handle an int, unsigned, but limited
+ * between min and max (unsigned)
+ * Two cases:
+ * a variable: point arg1 at it.
+ * a constant: pass it in arg2.
+ *
+ */
+
+extern int nmbjumbo9;
+
+int
+sysctl_int_checked(struct sysctl_oid *oidp, void *val, uint32_t min, uint32_t max, struct sysctl_req *req)
+{
the comment refers to something else and should be fixed e.g.
Handle an unsigned int variable with bound checking.
Returns 0 (and updates *val) if min <= v <= max;
returns EINVAL otherwhise (in which case *val is unchanged)
cheers
luigi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- From: Randall Stewart
- Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- References:
- mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- From: Randall Stewart
- mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- Prev by Date: Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- Next by Date: Re: VLANs and DHCP
- Previous by thread: Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- Next by thread: Re: mbuf patch with sysctl suggestions too
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|