Re: About NAT Traversal
- From: "Eric W. Bates" <ericx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:46:49 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ashoke saha wrote:
basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not have
kernel support till 6.0. you can take the patch from
there.
also NAT_T has moved from draft to RFC and do google
for NAT_T to get get the RFC's and also read the code
in the kernel patch and racoon.
Thank you. I have installed the patch; but I suspect that deciphering
the code is beyond my skill level. RFC 3948 is mentioned. I will start
there.
assuming you are talking about ipsec NAT_T.
Yes, we want to implement end-to-end esp rather than
ashoke.
--- Darren Pilgrim <phi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric W. Bates wrote:http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----describing how to
Hash: SHA1
Can someone please refer me to some documentation
implement NAT Traversal?In what context? The methods required to traverse a
NAT are highly
protocol-specific.
--
Darren Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
- --
Eric W. Bates
ericx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFwhl5D1roJTQ4LlERAsxrAJ9eNB6ZgR8tbAb1Iq+oIDpusX07SgCfZSY9
zaOJ0A+hBpNRaQt10TAUJ3k=
=h3AY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About NAT Traversal
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: About NAT Traversal
- Prev by Date: Re: mpd locking system?
- Next by Date: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Previous by thread: Re: mpd locking system?
- Next by thread: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|