Re: About NAT Traversal
- From: "Eric W. Bates" <ericx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:12:23 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:46:49AM -0500, Eric W. Bates wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ashoke saha wrote:
basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not haveThank you. I have installed the patch; but I suspect that deciphering
kernel support till 6.0. you can take the patch from
there.
also NAT_T has moved from draft to RFC and do google
for NAT_T to get get the RFC's and also read the code
in the kernel patch and racoon.
the code is beyond my skill level. RFC 3948 is mentioned. I will start
there.
Hi.
You probably don't really need to "decipher" that code, you'll just
need the skill level required to apply a patch to the kernel sources
and recompile your kernel (and recompiling your world is also probably
a good idea), then install the new headers (mainly
/usr/include/net/pfkeyv2.h).
Then you'll just have to recompile/reinstall ipsec-tools port, which
will autodetect NAT-T support (to be more exact, which will detect
that your /usr/include/net/pfkeyv2.h has the required structs for
NAT-T support) and which will be recompiled with such support.
Great. thanks.
I've already got the new kernel; but I neglected to rebuild racoon. I
will try that.
Yvan.
- --
Eric W. Bates
ericx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFwjuWD1roJTQ4LlERAv8DAKCYom6NqQaYoASRpXdDjVeNHXVUugCfSKzD
SAXJ9YEoiPG0ZZvRxsrLxHY=
=NV9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: About NAT Traversal
- From: Eric W. Bates
- Re: About NAT Traversal
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: About NAT Traversal
- Prev by Date: Re: ipfw pipe show ... help with output is needed, please.
- Next by Date: Re: mpd locking system?
- Previous by thread: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Next by thread: Re: ipfw pipe show ... help with output is needed, please.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|