Re: ipfw pipe show ... help with output is needed, please.
- From: Arone Silimantia <aronesimi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:58:46 -0800 (PST)
left to Drp on theSecond, there are seven headings (from BKT at the
values. What I reallyright) but underneath those seven headings are _9_
... but I can't tell whichwant to know is how many packets I am droppinig
the final number .. ifof the fields are the "dropped" - I assume it is
frequently just as baffledso, what is that measured in ? Packets ?
I can't help you with the rest of it, as I am
by ipfw/dummynet as the next man ..
But the 7/9 thing I can explain.
Tot_pkt: 2970975653
bytes: 2649647615805
Pkt: 2
Byte: 2992
Ok, thank you - and then the final number in the
output is the number of dropped _packets_, right ?
(snip 'ipfw pipe list' paste)
Trust me: there will be a lot more connections setup in those pipes than
that. I think it's just showing a snapshot. Or Ihave got it all
completely wrong and it's not actually working atall like I thought it
ought.
Who knows?
Can anyone clarify this ? Is 'ipfw pipe list' just
showing a snapshot, and when I see it listing a
"protocol", and port numbers, etc., it is still
applying to _all_ IP traffic, as I have my ipfw rule
phrased:
"from any to any" ?
Because I really want this dummynet pipe to throttle
_all_ traffic, and I only ever see it listing a "tcp"
protocol, and showing a tcp port number...
My second question was:
- what happens to the packets that show up in the
"Drp" column ? Am I losing connections/data/traffic,
or do those just get resent/reworked and nobody really
notices ?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Prev by Date: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Next by Date: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Previous by thread: Re: About NAT Traversal
- Next by thread: ETIMEDOUT bug
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|