Re: improved TSO interface needed
- From: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:53:36 -0800
On 2/25/07, Andre Oppermann <andre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
> On 2/25/07, Andre Oppermann <andre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Kip Macy wrote:
>> > Evidently FreeBSD violates the LSO spec by sending down up to socket
>> > buffer sized TSO segments to the network card. Is there a way to set
>> > this other than reducing net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max to a compliant value
>> > (64k)? And is there a way to for a device to communicate to the stack
>> > the maximum length of an mbuf chain?
>>
>> From netinet/ip_output.c:
>>
>> * When doing TSO limit a burst to TCP_MAXWIN minus the
>> * IP, TCP and Options length to keep ip->ip_len from
>> * overflowing. Prevent the last segment from being
>> * fractional thus making them all equal sized and set
>> * the flag to continue sending.
>>
>> TCP_MAXWIN is 64K.
>
> It is good to know that this how it is supposed to work even if it
> doesn't. You didn't directly answer my last question, since they're
> all supposed to be equal does that mean the max should be 32?
The current TSO code will send mbuf chains of up to 64K (minus headers)
to be split into MSS sized packets as specified by mbuf packet header
usually resulting in an MTU of 1500 bytes.
There is no way at the moment to tell the stack to send shorter mbuf
chain while still using TSO.
A google search for "LSO" doesn't yield any useful answers. The stack
doesn't send socket buffer sized mbuf chains if it larger than 64K.
Can you explain the problem you're seeing in more details perhaps? That'd
certainly help in finding a fix for your problem.
LSO is MicroSlop's term for TSO :) As usual, they rename it, and
next they do something non-standard to er 'differentiate' as the
euphemism goes...
Kinda what Sun's lawsuit back in the 90s against their Java
strategy was all about :)
Nevertheless, I don't understand Kip either, when we do TSO there
is no evidence on the wire, it still has MTU sized packets. I fail to
see why I should care about some LSO spec, what does it break?
Jack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: improved TSO interface needed
- From: Kip Macy
- Re: improved TSO interface needed
- References:
- improved TSO interface needed
- From: Kip Macy
- Re: improved TSO interface needed
- From: Andre Oppermann
- Re: improved TSO interface needed
- From: Kip Macy
- Re: improved TSO interface needed
- From: Andre Oppermann
- improved TSO interface needed
- Prev by Date: Re: improved TSO interface needed
- Next by Date: Re: improved TSO interface needed
- Previous by thread: Re: improved TSO interface needed
- Next by thread: Re: improved TSO interface needed
- Index(es):