Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE



On Friday 16 March 2007 02:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for
RELENG_6_2):

http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff

I received few success reports but I need wider testing because
changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out
there. If it breaks anything, please let me know. Especially, I
want to hear more about IPMI/ASF mode support, i.e., if it doesn't
work but setting hw.bge.allow_asf=0 in /boot/loader.conf fixes the
problem, definitely I want to know.

It is committed now but ASF mode is disabled by default because at
least two people reported breakage.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200703212253.l2LMrM9M041854

Thanks for your help!

Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE
    ... At 02:30 PM 3/16/2007, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... I received few success reports but I need wider testing because ... I have a name server that sees the odd watchdog reset. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE
    ... On Friday 16 March 2007 02:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... I received few success reports but I need wider testing because ... want to hear more about IPMI/ASF mode support, i.e., if it doesn't ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE
    ... I received few success reports but I need wider testing because ... changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out ... Jung-uk Kim ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE
    ... I received few success reports but I need wider testing because ... changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out ... Jung-uk Kim ...
    (freebsd-stable)