Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:36:53 +0100
Actually, I thought the change which moved the VLAN tag out of the mbuf tag pool and into the mbuf packet header had also been MFCed. It has not.
As CURRENT is the branch normally used for feature development it is probably best I don't MFC this unless the VLAN tag change is MFCed also.
Therefore there is not a lot of point in merging this change apart from to benefit from the code cleanup which M_PROMISC offers, so I'll back off for now.
Cheers...
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- From: Andre Oppermann
- Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- References:
- MFC of ether_input() changes
- From: Bruce M Simpson
- Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- From: Luigi Rizzo
- MFC of ether_input() changes
- Prev by Date: Corrupt packets in Jnet (Was: Re: rtentry and rtrequest)
- Next by Date: Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- Previous by thread: Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- Next by thread: Re: MFC of ether_input() changes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|