Re: Firewall
- From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:37:15 +1000
On 2007-Apr-30 10:58:18 +0100, Robert Watson <rwatson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One of the big selling points of IPFW is integration with DUMMYNET, which
offers bandwidth management facilities not present in the other systems.
I thought altq(4) could also do most of what dummynet(4) does but
based on a closer look, it seems that it can't do the packet delay
stuff, though it seems to have fairly similar bandwidth management
facilities.
is the main selling point for ipfw on my servers -- being able to rate
limit arbitrary IP addresses, port numbers, etc, both in terms of inbound
and outbound traffic is invaluable.
I extensively use dummynet at work to simulate WANs (bandwidth limited
and significant delays) between different servers in our models. It
has proved invaluable for relicating field problems.
--
Peter Jeremy
Attachment:
pgp2Vd4nBxU2n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firewall
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Firewall
- References:
- Firewall
- From: Jack Barnett
- Re: Firewall
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: Firewall
- From: Robert Watson
- Firewall
- Prev by Date: Current problem reports assigned to you
- Next by Date: Re: Firewall
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: Firewall
- Index(es):