Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote:VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi Yvan,
Hi Eric,
rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
programs uses some structs which size are changed by the patch.
Is there any hope to see NATT support, based on your patches, included
in -current before 7.0-RELEASE engineering process begins ?
There is always some hope :-)
As far as I know, the patch is ready to be applied, and I provided
both patches for FreeBSD6 and FreeBSD's HEAD.
But as I don't have a commit bit on FreeBSD's sources, I can't do the
remaining part of the work: commiting....
I know that some FreeBSD developpers have expressed some interest in
this patch, I had some discussions with some of them since some months
ago, but actually, I can just wait for a commit or for some
feedback/questions/bug reports/other things....
Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
Also lately someone in my digital neighborhood had problems compiling
the patch for kernels with and without NAT-T support, for KAME and
fast_ipsec. Seems some #ifdef and #includes were not worked out
properly. I do not know which verion of the patch was used because
they, unfortunately, always had the same name and no versioning.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- References:
- Applying NAT-T patch
- From: swaggy
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: Eric Masson
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Applying NAT-T patch
- Prev by Date: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Next by Date: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Previous by thread: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Next by thread: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: [GIT PATCH] another tranche of SCSI updates for 2.6.26
... commit 064922a805ec7aadfafdd27aa6b4908d737c3c1d ... This patch adds more
const keywords where appropriate. ... fix SLUB WARN_ON ... KVM: SVM: remove
now obsolete FIXME comment ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc6
... [PATCH] ... Change code ordering in disk.c ... The changes here
only affect the built-in swsusp. ... the remaining test is to try reverting this commit
from -rc6. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
... MAINTAINERS information, we have 3 options: ... There are things git
can help, and other things git does not ... Linus already gave a script to grep *-by: lines from
commit ... integration to git-based patch flow. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc6
... [PATCH] ... Change code ordering in disk.c ... The changes here
only affect the built-in swsusp. ... the remaining test is to try reverting this commit
from -rc6. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: .version keeps being updated
... 8993780a6e44fb4e7ed34e33458506a775356c6e is first bad commit ... Reverting
this from 2.6.20-rc1 made the build behave again, ... this patch started all the mess:
... Fix linux banner utsname information ... (Linux-Kernel)