Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:24:58 +0200
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:[...]
Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
You're right: I was sure that this patch had been reported to
"official" NAT-T patch, but it hasn't been yet, I appologize for
that.
While re-reading it, I remember now that I wanted to check again the
minlen computation.
The rest of the patch is ok and will be included today.
Also lately someone in my digital neighborhood had problems compiling
the patch for kernels with and without NAT-T support, for KAME and
fast_ipsec. Seems some #ifdef and #includes were not worked out
properly. I do not know which verion of the patch was used because
they, unfortunately, always had the same name and no versioning.
Well, the file is versionned as it's in a CVS, but I'm not sure this
specific CVS is available to public (this is the CVS used to update
sourceforge's projects web sites).
Now I know that the patch stayed there for a long time, I know that I
should have putted it somewhere else, with better versionning
informations available......
Yvan.
--
NETASQ
http://www.netasq.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Applying NAT-T patch
- From: swaggy
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: Eric Masson
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
- Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Applying NAT-T patch
- Prev by Date: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Next by Date: RE: Applying NAT-T patch
- Previous by thread: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Next by thread: Re: Applying NAT-T patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: FAST_IPSEC and NAT-T
... Also I just tried to compile a kernel with that Nat-T patch on the other ...
IPSEC kernel on 6.1-release and it failed. ... (freebsd-net) - Re: Applying NAT-T patch
... Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September? ... I was
sure that this patch had been reported to ... "official" NAT-T patch, but it hasn't
been yet, I appologize for ... security associations that use natt extensions? ...
(freebsd-net) - Re: Nautilus Absturz
... verschwindet der Desktop und kommt nach einer Weile ... nicht unbedingt den
CVS code, ... Die Quellen zum kompilieren bekommen und Dev-Header sind dank Gentoo
... Auch den Bug zu finden und einen Patch zu ... (de.comp.os.unix.apps.gnome) - Re: Genes pcHDTV 3000 analog problem
... had to apply the patch by hand for some reason ... after doing a cvs
up -D today. ... Thank you Gene, ... Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett,
... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: BK2CVS problem
... was there any route via which this malicious patch could've worked ... secondary
CVS repository instead of the primary BK repository. ... An argument might be made that all
patches sent to Linus should be at ... a minimum be GPG signed, but that assumes
that Linus would be willing ... (Linux-Kernel)