Re: 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- From: Sten Daniel Soersdal <netslists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:33:53 -0400
Lee Johnston wrote:
Hi all,
We've just been allocated a /31 for a point-to-point over ethernet. Any idea if FreeBSD supports 31-bit prefixes as per RFC 3021? All I'm getting are:
arp: 00:02:4a:9c:b8:81 attempts to modify permanent entry for xx.xx.xx.xx on em2.3211
It is likely that the /31 is not routed through your pppoe tunnel but instead assigned to your pppoe tunnel. Probably they expect you to use those two addresses in combination with NAT.
Routed operation is usually only possible (without trickery) on /30 or larger. But perhaps your /31 falls neatly within a /30 and they did not route the network/broadcast address?
Why not just ask your provider how you were thought to use these addresses? You are the customer, you cannot be expected to be the routing wiz on *their* network. I always ask anyway, the explanations are sometimes colorful but often i hear "oh, wait a minute, this doesn't make sense! hang on...".
--
Sten Daniel Soersdal
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- From: Lee Johnston
- 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- Prev by Date: Re: kern/112612: [lo] Traffic via additional lo(4) interface shows up on lo0 in bpf(4)
- Next by Date: Re: 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- Previous by thread: 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- Next by thread: Re: 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
... We've just been allocated a /31 for a point-to-point over ethernet. ... Any
idea if FreeBSD supports 31-bit prefixes as per RFC 3021? ... (freebsd-net) - 31-Bit IPv4 Prefixes
... We've just been allocated a /31 for a point-to-point over ethernet. ... Any
idea if FreeBSD supports 31-bit prefixes as per RFC 3021? ... (freebsd-net)