Re: Route caching ?
- From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:25:35 +0100
Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Does FreeBSD rtalloc*() (or any other) functions implement routeNot really, at least, not in the way one would think. rtalloc() is a legacy function.
caching and how ? I looked at the code but it's not exactly easiest
thing to read / understand :)
ip_output() will still call rtalloc() if you pass it a filled out 'struct route', a structure which is not a route, but an internal request to look up a route.
This is a wrapper for rtalloc_ign(), which in turn is a wrapper for rtalloc1(), the function which does the actual lookup.
rtalloc_ign() is pretty straightforward. Note however that this approach only checks the RTF_UP flag and ifp, nothing more. This makes it suitable for implementing floating statics, but nothing more dynamic than that.
regards,
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Route caching ?
- From: Ivo Vachkov
- Re: Route caching ?
- References:
- Route caching ?
- From: Ivo Vachkov
- Route caching ?
- Prev by Date: Wrong function descriptio
- Next by Date: Re: Allocating AF constants for vendors.
- Previous by thread: Route caching ?
- Next by thread: Re: Route caching ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|