Re: Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:56:19 +1000
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:19:47 +0300
"Vlad GALU" <dudu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
ports/netsed + pf/ipf (for transparent proxying)
Of course, the overhead is big.
great, thanks , that may do - i may only need it for a proof of concept at this time.
cheers,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it."
Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- From: Norberto Meijome
- Re: Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- From: Vlad GALU
- Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- Prev by Date: Re: Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- Next by Date: BPF divide instruction
- Previous by thread: Re: Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- Next by thread: Re: Netgraph node to replace packet contents?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
