Re: Quagga as border router
- From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:52:05 +0100
Folks have been asking about XORP in this thread.
XORP can take a full BGP feed just fine as long as you have enough memory.; for a full default-free-zone feed, you are looking at in the region of 1GB - 1.5GB, perhaps less if you use aggregation.
If you look at the NSDI '05 paper you'll see that it has a number of benefits over existing designs, BGP route propagation in particular should be faster:
http://www.usenix.org/events/nsdi05/tech/handley.html
The architecture is deliberately structured so that forwarding functionality may be implemented in hardware. I believe XORP may work with the NetFPGA but don't have firm information about this.
IPv6 support is strong as XORP was designed to route IPv6 from the start as a whole suite - multicast support is also strong.
regards,
BMS
[Note: my opinion may be biased as I served on XORP core team for a few years, and still actively contribute code to the project.]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quagga as border router
- From: Claudio Jeker
- Re: Quagga as border router
- References:
- Quagga as border router
- From: Steve Bertrand
- Re: Quagga as border router
- From: Sten Daniel Soersdal
- Re: Quagga as border router
- From: Steve Bertrand
- Re: Quagga as border router
- From: Sten Daniel Soersdal
- Re: Quagga as border router
- From: Steve Bertrand
- Quagga as border router
- Prev by Date: Re: Quagga as border router
- Next by Date: Re: Quagga as border router
- Previous by thread: Re: Quagga as border router
- Next by thread: Re: Quagga as border router
- Index(es):