Re: Re: nat and ipfw - divert or builtin



divert
ipnat
ipfw's integrated nat

I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use.

you seem to imply that you have reason to suspect that ipfw integrated
nat might not be reliable, or at least not as reliable as divert+natd.
any particular experiences or gossip to tell?

randy
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"



Relevant Pages