Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:44:56 +0200
Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, it likely needs more detailed investigation than that ;-)
Hmm, grepping has found one straw-chance: I found that if_stf.c calls
rtfree() instead of RTFREE_LOCKED (I cannot tell if RTFREE_LOCKED is
really needed in this situation or RTFREE is needed), and a diff to my
6-STABLE kernel configuration shows that I left IPv6 in this time.
Apparently, this was patched 4 days ago so I'll try two things: 1) build
with the new (patched) version and 2) if that doesn't work (probably
won't), I'll remove IPv6 from the kernel and try again. Each of this
steps will probably take something like 2 days (the average time between
panics is ~~ 1 day) until I can say if there's some progress.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Panic in rt_check
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Panic in rt_check
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Panic in rt_check
- Prev by Date: Re: Panic in rt_check
- Next by Date: Re: bridging ath
- Previous by thread: Re: Panic in rt_check
- Next by thread: Re: Panic in rt_check
- Index(es):