Re: Proposed #ifdef change to em
- From: Scott Long <scottl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:39:40 -0600
Jack Vogel wrote:
I have found that the FAST interrupt handling is implicated
in the watchdog resets that I have seen.
What I plan to do is revert to the way 6.2 had things, meaning
that FAST interrupts will be available but defined off by default.
I wanted to know if anyone has an issue with this. And more
importantly, I have personally not seen this problem on 7, but
I could set up #ifdef's in that driver to be the same way.
What does everyone think?
Jack
Let's give it another couple of days to work out the real problem
before we throw in the towel. Follow-ups in private...
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Proposed #ifdef change to em
- From: Jack Vogel
- Proposed #ifdef change to em
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Evolution of the em driver
- Next by Date: Re: Correct way to enable ipv6 and sixxs-aiccu?
- Previous by thread: Proposed #ifdef change to em
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
