Re: bridge and stp defaults
- From: "Ivo Vachkov" <ivo.vachkov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:23:15 +0200
On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <nike_d@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
enabled by default on them?
Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days?
There are several reasons not to enable STP on a bridge port unless
you're absolutely aware of what's happening here:
http://unilans.net/phrack/61/p61-0x0c_Fun_with_Spanning_Tree_Protocol.txt
Regards,
Niki
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
--
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a
genius to understand the simplicity." Dennis Ritchie
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bridge and stp defaults
- From: Niki Denev
- Re: bridge and stp defaults
- References:
- bridge and stp defaults
- From: Niki Denev
- bridge and stp defaults
- Prev by Date: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- Next by Date: WOL suport in Broadcom 5721 (57XX)
- Previous by thread: bridge and stp defaults
- Next by thread: Re: bridge and stp defaults
- Index(es):